Within this section
Subscribe
» July 2010
» June 2010
» May 2010
» April 2010
» March 2010
» February 2010
» January 2010
» December 2009
» November 2009
» October 2009
» September 2009
» August 2009
» July 2009
» June 2009
» May 2009
» April 2009
» March 2009
» February 2009
» January 2009
» December 2008
» November 2008
» October 2008
» September 2008
» August 2008
» July 2008
» June 2008
» May 2008
» April 2008
» March 2008
» February 2008
» January 2008
» December 2007
» November 2007
» October 2007
» September 2007
» August 2007
» July 2007
Friday, September 28, 2007
New Jersey Appellate Court Invalidates State's Black Bear Management Policies
Washington, D.C. - Safari Club International and other sportsmen's groups continue to fight for bear hunting in New Jersey and its use as a management tool to help control the state's growing black bear population.
Today, the New Jersey appellate court issued a ruling that frustrated those efforts. The court determined that the state failed to adopt its comprehensive black bear management policies in accordance with state procedural requirements. The court's ruling today invalidated the 2005 policies, leaving the state with no Black Bear Management Policies in effect and without the ability to implement a 2007 black bear season.
"Unfortunately, the court's decision allows New Jersey bear management to continue to be driven by politics instead of by science," said SCI President Dennis Anderson.
The policies had been established in 2005 and had made it possible for New Jersey to hold a bear season in December 2005. In November 2006, the Commissioner of New Jersey's Department of Environmental Protection abruptly withdrew the 2005 policies, and prevented a 2006 New Jersey black bear hunt. SCI and other wildlife and sportsmen's groups sued to challenge that withdrawal.
Despite a growing bear population and increasing numbers of human/bear incidents, New Jersey's DEP Commissioner made it impossible for a bear hunt to take place in 2006 and has recently recommended the adoption of new policies that would use only non-lethal bear management strategies for the near future. The New Jersey Fish and Game Council, which is charged by law with developing the state's black bear management policies, has proposed a combination of hunting seasons to help control the population and minimize adverse human-bear conflicts and non-lethal strategies to further minimize conflicts. Until the Commissioner agrees to policies developed by the Council, the state cannot hold any black bear seasons and the bear population and number of conflicts will continue to rise.
SCI will continue to fight for black bear hunting in New Jersey. SCI, together with the New Jersey Federation of Sportsmen's Groups Inc. and other groups involved in the lawsuit, are considering whether to appeal today's ruling.
Media Contact:
Anna Seidman, Litigation Counsel, SCI-DC (202) 543-8733 or aseidman@sci-dc.org
UUUGHHHHH! When the black bears begin to get more aggressive in the state of New Jersey and understand that man is not a threat and that the citizens of New Jersey can not hurt them, there is going to be more attacks. The first child or family that gets hurt should sue the hell out of the state for mismanagement. We must as a society hunt these large predators and teach them to have a distinct fear of man, or it is asking for trouble and unfortunately in New Jersey trouble is probably already on its way! Unfortunately it is going to take increased attacks for this to happen- Kevin Paulson
POSTED BY KEVIN C PAULSON AT 03:55 PM | 5 COMMENTS | LINKS TO THIS POST | EMAIL A POST
Comments:
"Unfortunately, the court's decision allows New Jersey bear management to continue to be driven by politics instead of by science," said SCI President Dennis Anderson. THIS IS A REAL JOKE - what reliable and peer-reviewed science is there available to warrant reinstituting a bear hunt in NJ? POLITICS - yes it is politics all the way, but it is from those who are deprived of their recreation; it has nothing to do with a bear overpopulation, or science, folks! And please, don't trivialize this issue by limiting these views to liberals, only!
Posted By Greg on Wednesday, April 22, 2009 at 10:06 AM
It is unfortunate that some people can't use common sense. I've seen pictures of deer in the Florida everglades that have died of starvation because hunting was stopped by liberal groups, and it wasnt a pretty sight. In Colorado these groups have interfered with the bear hunting and because of it the blackbear population is getting out of hand. Will it ever end? We have to keep fighting
Posted By Richard Nation on Monday, October 1, 2007 at 08:31 AM
Good post and your comment war right on! Liberals, especially liberal judges, are a pain in the rear!
Posted By Jon on Sunday, September 30, 2007 at 06:55 PM
This political nonsense is going on for some time now. In Ontario they banned spring bear about 10 years ago, today bears have become a nuisance animal in many parts of Ontario and the government still sees no common sense. Liberals. what more can I say. That goes for New Jersey too!
-Othmar Vohringer-
Posted By Othmar Vohringer on Saturday, September 29, 2007 at 11:50 PM
Kevin,
I could not a agree with you more. Until society realizers there need to be a balance in nature men. women, children and pets alike can and will be threatened by wildlife. The sad thing though is that people will not realize it until it happens to one of there own. They are not pets, they are wildlife.
Posted By dennis brauchle on Friday, September 28, 2007 at 09:24 PM
Post Your Comment Here








